February 07, 2008
Did talk radio force Romney's hand?
Today, Mitt Romney gracefully bowed out of the Republican primary race at CPAC. After reading some of his speech I have to wonder, did talk radio force his hand? Romney says in part,
"I disagree with Senator McCain on a number of issues, as you know. But
I agree with him on doing whatever it takes to be successful in Iraq,
on finding and executing Osama bin Laden, and on eliminating Al Qaeda
and terror. If I fight on in my campaign, all the way to the
convention, I would forestall the launch of a national campaign and
make it more likely that Senator Clinton or Obama would win. And in
this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign, be a part of aiding
a surrender to terror."
I wonder if he is more worried about what others may do in his name, rather than what he may do in the race. There has been a lot of vitriol from a lot of prominent people for McCain, and if that got dragged out then no Republican would stand a chance come November. By exiting now, those people can come to grips with a McCain candidacy, and even if they are not pro-McCain, they can at least stop being anti-McCain. Romney has removed their reason for the attacks by bowing out of the race, and he has put the good of the party before his own quest for the presidency, giving it a chance to heal while the Democrats continue battling.
Posted by: jcallery at
08:17 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 258 words, total size 2 kb.
February 05, 2008
Some thoughts on the Republican Primary
Well, by this time the voting in 'Tsunami Tuesday' states is wrapping up, and we'll soon find out who the real front runner is for the Republican nomination. While I was listening to Bill Lumaye on WPTF during the ride home, a thought came to mind.
First let's set the scene. Bill was talking politics, and Rick Martinez jumped in with some words for the conservative side of the big tent. Basically, he thinks conservatives need to grow up and quit being 'cry babies' about McCain's candidacy. I think most of this stems from Ann Coulter's statements that if McCain gets the nomination she's voting for Hillary. Plus, a lot of talk show hosts have recently started talking up Romney as the next great conservative while bashing McCain, like Rush, Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and Hugh Hewitt (but he's always been a Romney guy). Rick seems to think that there's too much whining going on, and not enough action.
I don't necessarily agree with this. I think that what we are seeing is a sudden coalescing of the conservatives behind the right most of the remaining candidates. Before Florida, there were still a lot of conservative options, like Fred Thompson, Duncan Hunter, and Tom Tancredo. Since Florida, they have all gone away. That leaves Romney. Remember that Florida was only a week ago in this accelerated primary season, so I don't think it's unusual that they have come out for Romney, and come out forcefully. And coming out in the way they know best and the way they can have the most impact. They had to if they were going to make any impact on 'Tsunami Tuesday'. Also, the complaints against McCain have always been there, they were simply overcome by a lot of other talk about a lot of other candidates.
So, are conservatives a bunch of cry babies? I don't think so. Ann Coulter probably went too far, but she made her point. If the nomination is still up for grabs when the primary comes to North Carolina, you better believe I will be there making my voice heard. And so will a lot of other conservatives.
First let's set the scene. Bill was talking politics, and Rick Martinez jumped in with some words for the conservative side of the big tent. Basically, he thinks conservatives need to grow up and quit being 'cry babies' about McCain's candidacy. I think most of this stems from Ann Coulter's statements that if McCain gets the nomination she's voting for Hillary. Plus, a lot of talk show hosts have recently started talking up Romney as the next great conservative while bashing McCain, like Rush, Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and Hugh Hewitt (but he's always been a Romney guy). Rick seems to think that there's too much whining going on, and not enough action.
I don't necessarily agree with this. I think that what we are seeing is a sudden coalescing of the conservatives behind the right most of the remaining candidates. Before Florida, there were still a lot of conservative options, like Fred Thompson, Duncan Hunter, and Tom Tancredo. Since Florida, they have all gone away. That leaves Romney. Remember that Florida was only a week ago in this accelerated primary season, so I don't think it's unusual that they have come out for Romney, and come out forcefully. And coming out in the way they know best and the way they can have the most impact. They had to if they were going to make any impact on 'Tsunami Tuesday'. Also, the complaints against McCain have always been there, they were simply overcome by a lot of other talk about a lot of other candidates.
So, are conservatives a bunch of cry babies? I don't think so. Ann Coulter probably went too far, but she made her point. If the nomination is still up for grabs when the primary comes to North Carolina, you better believe I will be there making my voice heard. And so will a lot of other conservatives.
Posted by: jcallery at
08:10 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 364 words, total size 2 kb.
February 02, 2008
The Navy of tomorrow
Is going to have some pretty cool toys to play with - especially this one.
So, this thing has a range of 200 miles, and the projectile reaches speeds of 8000 feet per second. My question is, how do you control it? That has to be a lot of G forces generated when that thing launches. Can a GPS module handle it? And what about whatever moving parts are necessary to keep the projectile on target? How do you keep them from being sheered off? A 200 mile range is great, but it's useless if you can't put ordinance on target.
There is some speculation that some kind of sabot round would be used, and I think that makes a lot of sense. A sabot is essentially a missile in a missile. It was originally designed to defeat tanks, where the external sleeve would expend itself on the tank's armored shell, blowing a hole in it that the inner projectile would slide through so it could explode on the inside. In this case, the sabot would be used during the launch, ablating and expending itself during acceleration, leaving the internal missile unharmed and able to complete it's mission.
via Hotair
So, this thing has a range of 200 miles, and the projectile reaches speeds of 8000 feet per second. My question is, how do you control it? That has to be a lot of G forces generated when that thing launches. Can a GPS module handle it? And what about whatever moving parts are necessary to keep the projectile on target? How do you keep them from being sheered off? A 200 mile range is great, but it's useless if you can't put ordinance on target.
There is some speculation that some kind of sabot round would be used, and I think that makes a lot of sense. A sabot is essentially a missile in a missile. It was originally designed to defeat tanks, where the external sleeve would expend itself on the tank's armored shell, blowing a hole in it that the inner projectile would slide through so it could explode on the inside. In this case, the sabot would be used during the launch, ablating and expending itself during acceleration, leaving the internal missile unharmed and able to complete it's mission.
via Hotair
Posted by: jcallery at
08:10 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 204 words, total size 1 kb.
Do Republicans really think this way?
Within this article Powerline discusses the tendency of Republicans to nominate the heir apparent, or 'next in line' as our presidential nominee. Is this really how people think? We're only talking about the most important job in this country, and the person who will be, for all intents and purposes, the most powerful person on earth. Leading America should not be a case of 'next-in-line', it should be a case of who can do the job best. Personally, I am more interested in electing the person who has the best credentials and lines up the closest with my beliefs, not the guy who thinks he deserves it simply because he comes next.
Posted by: jcallery at
07:51 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.
February 01, 2008
What to do with Exxon's obscene profits
So, Exxon-Mobil's rolled up over 40 billion in profits over the last year. The question in Washington seems to be, "How do we get our hands on some of that?". In fact, Hillary is talking about resurrecting the windfall tax on oil profits. In typical big government fashion. the politicians are approaching this the wrong way. If they want to get some of that back in to the hands of the people (of course, I'm making the assumption that that is what they actually want to do), increasing taxes is not going to be effective. I, however, do have an easy solution.
Repeal the dividend tax.
more...
Repeal the dividend tax.
more...
Posted by: jcallery at
10:32 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 242 words, total size 2 kb.
The Nightmare Scenario
So, I get a chain email that goes something like this:
Please forward this e-mail to all of your
Republican friends..... and to as many others as you wish to cause
sleepless nights...
So is it feasible? Who knows in today's political climate. I had actually had this thought before, but I don't think that the voters would stand for it. Plus, the Democrat Party has to get some new blood front and center. The Clintons aren't going to last forever.
Last night I
had a terrifying nightmare. It was so real, so life-like and so
vivid I woke up in a cold sweat. Let me describe it to you
briefly...
1. Hillary wins the Democratic Party nomination
for President of the United States
2. Naturally, she wants to choose as her
running mate someone with a lot of knowledge and experience in
government and foreign affairs, someone who is a seasoned campaigner who
could bring a lot of strength to the ticket. Who better than Bill, her
husband?!!!
3. Hill and Bill go on to win the election in
November and the Democrats maintain control of the House and the
Senate.
4. Hillary is sworn in as President on
January 20, 2009. The next day, after all the inauguration parties are
over, she calls a press conference to make an announcement: she is
resigning as President!!! Bill, as the Vice President, immediately
becomes President!!! This is all perfectly legal under the 22nd
Amendment to the Constitution, for it states that "no person may
be elected as president more than twice". Bill is not being
elected for a third term but is merely serving out the remainder of
Hillary's term---all 4 years of it.
5. But wait! There's more! The following
day Bill calls a press conference to make an announcement. He has chosen
someone to fill the now-vacant office of Vice President. Guess who he
picks? Why, Hillary, of course!!! So she can run for two more
terms.
Posted by: jcallery at
06:52 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 332 words, total size 4 kb.
23kb generated in CPU 0.0147, elapsed 0.0348 seconds.
39 queries taking 0.025 seconds, 82 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
39 queries taking 0.025 seconds, 82 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








