February 28, 2008
The nightmare scenario
So, what happens when the next president is not selected by the Electoral College? This may be a relevant question if a third party candidate can actually win a state or two. Is this possible? Maybe - Nader has thrown his hat into the ring, and although Bloomberg has said he is not running, some people think that he may just be biding his time. The problem is if that third party picks up enough votes to prevent a candidate from getting the 270 needed to become the president-elect.
If that happens, the House of Representatives goes into emergency session to choose the next president. But, it is not a straight vote - each state votes as a block. The candidate needs a majority, 26 states, to win. If a state's representatives split evenly on the vote, then the state is thrown out. If you take the current Congress and assume that each representative is going to vote for his/her party's candidate, then it would fall out like this: 26 Democrat, 21 Republican and 3 ties. So, the Democrat candidate would win. But, of course, it is not that simple. A shift of only one or two states could move some states from the D to the R column, or representatives voting in line with their state's general election results could change things. In that case, the House would be deadlocked, and the job would fall to the Vice-President Elect, who is chosen by the Senate.
In the Senate, the Vice-President elect has to get 51 votes, and the current VP can not vote. Right now, with Lieberman caucusing with the Democrats, that would be enough to elect the Democrat Vice-Presidential candidate. If he chooses not to, then the Senate is deadlocked as well, and the job then goes to the Speaker of the House.
That's right - President Pelosi.
Sweet dreams...
Posted by: jcallery at
09:37 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 315 words, total size 2 kb.
February 19, 2008
Unintended Consequences in Florida
According to the latest
Rasmussen poll, McCain has a commanding lead over Obama in Florida. It is more than his lead over Clinton, which is reversed from about every other state. It sounds like the difficulty over Florida's delegates is having unintended consequences for the Democrats. Obama's opposition to seating Florida is depressing his numbers, and the question is whether or not that would carry over to the general election. It also raises the question about whether or not Florida Democrats will be enthusiastic in their support of either candidate if their delegates are not seated after all.
It will be interesting to see if Florida gets a place at the convention, and if they don't, how it affects turnout in the state. Needless to say, as a state that has been a battleground state in the past two elections, this could have a significant effect on the race.
via
Hotair.
Posted by: jcallery at
08:04 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 155 words, total size 1 kb.
February 13, 2008
Anybody but Hillary?
Well, Barack Obama won his sixth, seventh and eighth primaries in a row last night, and he won them in landslides. He certainly seems to have the momentum, and everyone is jumping on the bandwagon. I just have to wonder, is there a segment of those voters who are supporting him just to block Hillary? Her negatives have always been a problem - at times over 50% of the population have said they would not vote for her. Now, those that are Democrats have someone else to vote for with a realistic chance of stopping her.
If that is the case, it may be a bright spot for the Republican candidate. Once (if) Hillary is stopped that voter bloc will no longer be in play. And given the high turnout in the Democrat primaries and caucuses, that would be a good thing for the Republican candidate should those people decide it is too much trouble to vote in November.
Posted by: jcallery at
06:58 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 162 words, total size 1 kb.
1
On the other hand, nothing will unite the Republican base more than if Hilary is the Democratic nominee. If Obama is the nominee, I can see a lot of fence riders in the republican party jumping ship for him, regardless of who the republican candidate is.
I think the worse thing for the republican party will be Obama being the Democratic nominee.
Posted by: Brian Megilligan at Wed Feb 13 18:10:27 2008 (XjDz1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 07, 2008
Did talk radio force Romney's hand?
Today, Mitt Romney gracefully
bowed out of the Republican primary race at CPAC. After reading some of his speech I have to wonder, did talk radio force his hand? Romney says in part,
"I disagree with Senator McCain on a number of issues, as you know. But
I agree with him on doing whatever it takes to be successful in Iraq,
on finding and executing Osama bin Laden, and on eliminating Al Qaeda
and terror. If I fight on in my campaign, all the way to the
convention, I would forestall the launch of a national campaign and
make it more likely that Senator Clinton or Obama would win. And in
this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign, be a part of aiding
a surrender to terror."
I wonder if he is more worried about what others may do in his name, rather than what he may do in the race. There has been a lot of vitriol from a lot of prominent people for McCain, and if that got dragged out then no Republican would stand a chance come November. By exiting now, those people can come to grips with a McCain candidacy, and even if they are not pro-McCain, they can at least stop being anti-McCain. Romney has removed their reason for the attacks by bowing out of the race, and he has put the good of the party before his own quest for the presidency, giving it a chance to heal while the Democrats continue battling.
Posted by: jcallery at
08:17 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 258 words, total size 2 kb.
February 05, 2008
Some thoughts on the Republican Primary
Well, by this time the voting in 'Tsunami Tuesday' states is wrapping up, and we'll soon find out who the real front runner is for the Republican nomination. While I was listening to Bill Lumaye on
WPTF during the ride home, a thought came to mind.
First let's set the scene. Bill was talking politics, and Rick Martinez jumped in with some words for the conservative side of the big tent. Basically, he thinks conservatives need to grow up and quit being 'cry babies' about McCain's candidacy. I think most of this stems from Ann Coulter's statements that if McCain gets the nomination she's voting for Hillary. Plus, a lot of talk show hosts have recently started talking up Romney as the next great conservative while bashing McCain, like Rush, Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and Hugh Hewitt (but he's always been a Romney guy). Rick seems to think that there's too much whining going on, and not enough action.
I don't necessarily agree with this. I think that what we are seeing is a sudden coalescing of the conservatives behind the right most of the remaining candidates. Before Florida, there were still a lot of conservative options, like Fred Thompson, Duncan Hunter, and Tom Tancredo. Since Florida, they have all gone away. That leaves Romney. Remember that Florida was only a week ago in this accelerated primary season, so I don't think it's unusual that they have come out for Romney, and come out forcefully. And coming out in the way they know best and the way they can have the most impact. They had to if they were going to make any impact on 'Tsunami Tuesday'. Also, the complaints against McCain have always been there, they were simply overcome by a lot of other talk about a lot of other candidates.
So, are conservatives a bunch of cry babies? I don't think so. Ann Coulter probably went too far, but she made her point. If the nomination is still up for grabs when the primary comes to North Carolina, you better believe I will be there making my voice heard. And so will a lot of other conservatives.
Posted by: jcallery at
08:10 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 364 words, total size 2 kb.
February 02, 2008
Do Republicans really think this way?
Within
this article Powerline discusses the tendency of Republicans to nominate the heir apparent, or 'next in line' as our presidential nominee. Is this really how people think? We're only talking about the most important job in this country, and the person who will be, for all intents and purposes, the most powerful person on earth. Leading America should not be a case of 'next-in-line', it should be a case of who can do the job best. Personally, I am more interested in electing the person who has the best credentials and lines up the closest with my beliefs, not the guy who thinks he deserves it simply because he comes next.
Posted by: jcallery at
07:51 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.
February 01, 2008
The Nightmare Scenario
So, I get a chain email that goes something like this:
Last night I
had a terrifying nightmare. It was so real, so life-like and so
vivid I woke up in a cold sweat. Let me describe it to you
briefly...
1. Hillary wins the Democratic Party nomination
for President of the United States
2. Naturally, she wants to choose as her
running mate someone with a lot of knowledge and experience in
government and foreign affairs, someone who is a seasoned campaigner who
could bring a lot of strength to the ticket. Who better than Bill, her
husband?!!!
3. Hill and Bill go on to win the election in
November and the Democrats maintain control of the House and the
Senate.
4. Hillary is sworn in as President on
January 20, 2009. The next day, after all the inauguration parties are
over, she calls a press conference to make an announcement: she is
resigning as President!!! Bill, as the Vice President, immediately
becomes President!!! This is all perfectly legal under the 22nd
Amendment to the Constitution, for it states that "no person may
be elected as president more than twice". Bill is not being
elected for a third term but is merely serving out the remainder of
Hillary's term---all 4 years of it.
5. But wait! There's more! The following
day Bill calls a press conference to make an announcement. He has chosen
someone to fill the now-vacant office of Vice President. Guess who he
picks? Why, Hillary, of course!!! So she can run for two more
terms.
Please forward this e-mail to all of your
Republican friends..... and to as many others as you wish to cause
sleepless nights...
So is it feasible? Who knows in today's political climate. I had actually had this thought before, but I don't think that the voters would stand for it. Plus, the Democrat Party has to get some new blood front and center. The Clintons aren't going to last forever.
Posted by: jcallery at
06:52 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 332 words, total size 4 kb.
25kb generated in CPU 0.0303, elapsed 0.0809 seconds.
40 queries taking 0.067 seconds, 75 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.